Disclaimer: The following blog post is based on a research exercise conducted in the first half of 2013
by AidData, in partnership with the Government of Nepal and with support from the Open Aid Partnership. The purpose of
the research project was to explore new data collection methodologies. The data mentioned in this post are meant as an
example of those new methodologies, and should be verified from other sources before any external referencing of specific
In all countries, whether rich or poor, contracts are at the nexus of revenue generation, budget planning, resource
management and the delivery of public goods. Open contracting refers to
norms and practices for increased disclosure and participation in public contracting at all stages of the contracting
There are very good reasons for making procurement processes transparent. Public posting of tender notices and
"requests for proposals" helps support free and fair competitive bidding - increasing citizen trust while also
improving the likelihood of securing the best possible supplier. Once procurement is finished, public posting of
contract awards gives important assurance for citizens, development partners, and competing companies that
procurement processes are open and fair. Increasingly, open contracting in procurement transparency through
portals like this one is becoming the norm for governments around
the world. There is also a global initiative at work to establish a
common standard for contracting data.
At the same time, there are many reasons why project-level data are useful for planners and decision makers
outside of procurement considerations. Knowing where projects are taking place helps with policy, research,
planning, and coordination. Efforts like the International Aid Transparency
Initiative (IAT), for instance, push development partners to publish project-level data. What has seen little
exploration, relatively speaking at least, is the potential for valuable overlap between these two silos of transparency.
Contract Data for Planners
With so much momentum behind procurement transparency, there is an untapped opportunity to leverage data from public
procurement processes to provide operational insight into activities. Procurement data can help answer two of the most
important questions in project-level aid transparency: (1) Where are projects taking place? (2) How much money is being
invested at each location?
Take an example from Nepal. Consulting the government's aid management system
yields some basic, but already useful, information about a
particular transportation project.
This type of information can be useful for anyone trying to assess patterns of transportation investment in the country
or, for that matter, patterns of development partner financing.
This gives us some basic information about the project, but doesn't tell the whole story. However, by simply
accessing contract data which are already being published for other purposes, we can gain much greater insight
into the project.
These data, simple as they are, start to give us specifics - they tell us how much is being spent on different
bridges, what kinds of bridges are being constructed, and who is doing the construction. Mashing these two simple
tables together can also give us a picture of the overall allocation of project funding.
As part of the research project, each of these contracts was geocoded (along with hundreds more),
allowing us to add geographic visualization to our analysis. By putting the contracts on a map we can start to see
where various construction projects are taking place, and what the rough distribution of funding is to different
parts of the country.
Procurement transparency, however, is not limited only to contracts. Tender notices, however simple, give us
further insight into the activities of a project. The next map shows us not only where contracts have been issued,
but also where construction will take place in the future.
With these simple figures, constructed from publicly available procurement data, planners can get much more insight
into project actities.
Open contracting data have intrinsic value for transparency and accountability. However, they also have significant
value for planners - even those who only care about getting greater insight into project activities. At the moment though,
contracting data are too difficult to access. While contracting data are increasingly becoming available, they are often
posted on stand-alone websites, in diverse data formats and without structured access. By standardizing around a core
contracting data format and accessibility approach, we can unlock the potential to use contracting data at scale not only
for transparency, but also as an effort-free addition to the arsenal of available data for project-level planning,
coordination, and accountability. The utility could be even higher if combined with performance and results data.
When developing any public data standard, there are opportunities and risks. For open contracting data, there is a
huge opportunity to make those data equally relevant for project planners as for those more purely interested in transparency
and accountability. The pilot conducted by the Open Aid Partnership and AidData has explored this potential for overlap,
yielding key insights that we hope can be used in the future development of an open and broadly relevant open
contracting data standard.